Diabetes Management Planner

Shalit, Israel and hypocrisy

14 July 2009the last week marked the third anniversary of the imprisonment of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit in the Gaza Strip. After the raid at the border against an Israeli military post by Hamas and other fringe groups, the titles on the capture of Shalit began to circulate in the Western media as follows: "Breaking News: Kidnapped Soldier Isreali. Since the beginning, politicians all over the world have called for the release of Shalit, a statement confirming that the political ties between Israel and the various stations of Western power. Not surprisingly, no Western politician has ever invoked or pressed for the release of Palestinian prisoners - surprise me if they could also indicate only one. Hypocritically, world leaders and public office launch petitions for the release of a prisoner of war [Rome and Paris have given the honorary citizenship of Gilad Shalit, NdT], while Israel keeps thousands of Palestinians in prison without due process. These acts of war do not deserve the title of CNN, not one. Instead, for Shalit is happening and this is quite assurdo.Shalit, captured in combat, is a prisoner of war and not a civilian. It was, and still is, a soldier serving in the Israeli occupation forces along the "border of an enemy entity," in the words of the Israeli government that describe Gaza. As a fighter, he was subject to capture in a situation of conflict, but politicians do not remember these details when they ask for the release of Shalit. However now identify many Palestinian prisoners as "terrorists", without making questioni.Mentre Hamas is accused "of violations of international law, Israel has kidnapped and seized thousands of Palestinians, many of them detained for unknown reasons and not declared, even to Israelis in terms of administrative detention. Hundreds of women and children are being held without evidence. According to Adalah, the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, there are 98 women and 346 children in prisons Israeli figures in February 2009. Now do not get me wrong, I am sure that some Palestinian prisoners have "blood on their hands" (as Israeli politicians like to say). These prisoners, which affects a minority of Israelis, are part of the political groups that consider these tactics as resistance. In its 42 years of occupation, Israel has built up Palestinian prisoners as if they were playing cards, mixing them in and out of prisons. The Palestinians are caught in a fierce, tortured, interrogated and forced all'impedimento of legal representation for years and some even decenni.Il actual number of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli cells is also impossible to calculate if the estimated figure of 11,000, while the Palestinians hold only the famous Shalit. This is one, not even a hundred and a thousand, but one. However there is no match, the world remains blind to the discrepancy in numbers. Israeli and Western politicians cleverly turned his face to the hypocrisy and only sympathize with Shalit and never a Palestinian. On the website of Haaretz, the newspaper "liberal" of Israel, there is a clock that counts the days of captivity of Shalit, currently 1109 days and still counting. Could not we put a timer for the imprisonment of the Palestinians, because there are too many lives by contare.La Western media campaign for the release of Shalit is undeniably one-sided. His father, Noam Shalit, has become a public figure for their rights, pleading with politicians to help free her son. He met with several prominent world leaders, sympathizing with each hoping to recover Shalit. Unlike Noam Shalit, the Palestinian fathers do not have the luxury of being able to travel to Europe asking politicians to help free their sons and daughters because there is still a military occupation. When the Palestinians were kidnapped in the night in the West barely hear a whisper from the sources of news. Occasionally, a short Haaretz news on a number of Palestinians "wanted" and imprisoned during a night raid, but only if they consider interesting. And of course, usually do not because most of the Israeli operations are segrete.Vorrei see the day when all Palestinian prisoners and Gilad Shalit will be freed. Palestinian negotiators have repeatedly delivered to Israel lists on lists of prisoners they want freed and all requests were refused. It seems that the Israeli government do not worry about Shalit, because if you really did, he immediately negotiated a prisoner exchange in 2006. Instead, the Israeli army has begun to wreak havoc on Gaza with a military operation designed to "save" Shalit, who has failed miserably. If you want the process to go forward, the Western political should demand the release of Shalit and closed thousands of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails. Israel must sit at the negotiating table and Western politicians should push this. Otherwise, Shalit is not going anywhere.

Cool Hair Ideas For Volleyball

The truth behind the propaganda about the "sovereignty" of Iraq

Hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops will remain located in dozens of U.S. military bases around the country

July 1, 2009 "The corporate media are all excited and give a blanket coverage to the story of Iraqis" regain their sovereignty, "since U.S. troops are withdrawn from Iraqi cities. This course is livid and unfounded propaganda - hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops will remain in Iraq placed in dozens of U.S. military bases that have been built throughout the country.
"Today in Iraq there are approximately 130,000 U.S. military. The majority of U.S. soldiers who were deployed in Iraqi cities are indented in garrisons elsewhere in the country. The U.S. Air Force controls the Iraqi airspace. The Navy United States controls the territorial waters of Iraq, "says Cryptogon blog.
"Sovereignty: No. Propaganda: Yes.
After the date of complete withdrawal "official" in 2011, that Admiral Mike Mullen has revealed not even be guaranteed, "Obama plans to leave behind a" residual force "of tens of thousands of troops to continue training the Iraqi security forces, capture the cells of foreign terrorists and protect American institutions, "said the New York Times last February.
" residual forces "is a euphemism for" occupying army " , since only the most stupidly naive could never believe that Iraq now is nothing more than a puppet state subjected to the empire of the new world order.
A senior official explained it more clearly by the thread and sign the Los Angeles Times : "When President Obama said that we were going" out "from Iraq within 16 months, some people have felt" out ", and each leaves. But this will not happen, "said the officer.
Indeed, when the last calculation was done almost three years ago , the U.S. military in Iraq had built no less than 55 military bases, fully functional, with the emergency funding to build many more.
addition, U.S. troops do not leave even the city altogether. Reports have confirmed that U.S. tanks will continue to patrol areas outside the Green Zone and Baghdad airport. The streets of major cities are still patrolled by US-trained Iraqi soldiers will take place at checkpoints everywhere harassing people on the pretext of checking documents. In addition, if the Iraqis "need help" by U.S. troops to undertake security procedures, they will return soon to the streets just like before.
Iraqis themselves are not deceived by the farce. As the New York Times admits , today the "celebrations" seem staged. " According to the report, "The police cars were decorated with garlands of plastic flowers and signs that celebrate" Independence Day "were associated with shock-proof walls and fences around the city. Monday night, a festive evening celebration at the Park Zahra with singers and visitors attracted mainly young people, many of them policemen out of service. "
"There is no doubt that this is not sovereignty national because the Americans will remain inside Iraq on military bases, "said Salim Najim, 40, teacher of Basra." But the government wants to convince people that there is a withdrawal of foreign troops, although the government can not protect citizens in some cities in Iraq even with the presence of U.S. forces. "
According Websters Dictionary, the" sovereignty "is defined as" freedom from external control.
Anyone who believes that Iraq is a country sovereign and has the "freedom from external control" or that it will never win as hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops are stationed in dozens of bases across the country, probably still believes that Saddam hid weapons of mass destruction.